Evaluation of Endoscopic Findings in Children with Caustic Ingestions: A Retrospective Research Korozif-Kostik Madde Maruziyeti Nedeniyle Başvuran Çocuklarda Endoskopik Bulguların Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Araştırma


Creative Commons License

Şahin Akkelle B., Volkan B., Dursun C., Korkmaz B., Karaoğlu S., Tutar E., ...Daha Fazla

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, cilt.43, sa.1, ss.22-28, 2023 (Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 43 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5336/medsci.2022-91869
  • Dergi Adı: Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.22-28
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: children, Corrosives, endoscopy
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Accidental caustic ingestions cause damagecomplications in the gastrointestinal tract. In our study, the characteristics of children who underwent endoscopy due to caustic ingestions were evaluated. Material and Methods: The demographic, clinic, endoscopic data of symptomatic children who underwent endoscopy due to caustic ingestions between 2016-2021 were reviewed. According to Zargar classification, patients with normal or mild findings on endoscopy were defined as Group 1; those with moderate/severe findings on endoscopy were defined as Group 2. The data of the two groups were compared. Results: The mean age of 284 patients included in our study was 42±41 months, and 58.4% of them were male. The most frequently exposed caustic agents were household cleaning chemicals (87.3%). Most of the caustic agents exposed were alkaline (78.9%) and 64.3% were in granule form. Esophageal corrosive damage compatible with at least Grade 2a was found in 26.1% of the patients. Complaints of drooling, dysphagia were more frequent in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the chemical properties of exposed agents. In the follow-up, esophageal stenosis was detected in 2.8% of the patients and pyloric stenosis was detected in 1 patient. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that drooling and dysphagia symptoms are important in predicting esophageal damage in caustic ingestions, but oropharyngeal examination findings may be misleading. Preventive medicine approaches, inspections and sanctions for corrosive chemicals that are produced, sold, stored improperly are important in preventing these accidents.