Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated With the Long Cephalomedullary Nail


Irgit K. S. , Richard R. D. , Beebe M. J. , Bowen T. R. , Kubiak E., Horwitz D. S.

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, cilt.29, 2015 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier identifier

Özet

Objective:To evaluate the healing rate, complications, role of reduction and screw placement, and the 1-year mortality in the treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the long cephalomedullary nail.Design:Retrospective review.Setting:Two different Level-1 trauma centers: Geisinger Medical Center and the University of Utah.Patients:One hundred forty-eight patients with intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA class 31-A3) eligible for review. All patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up and were available for radiologic checks and assessment of outcomes and complications.Intervention:Long cephalomedullary nail.Main Outcome Measures:Medical records were reviewed for reoperation, demographic parameters, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and need for transfusion. Mortality rates at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year were also recorded. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly as needed.Results:The average age of patients was 69.9 (range, 19-95) years. Average length of follow-up was 53 (range, 12-148) months. The average surgical time was 71.8 (range, 26-229) minutes. Twenty-four patients (16%) required blood transfusions, and the average transfusion required was 205.1 mL (range, 20-800). Five different long nail designs were used to treat the patients. One patient (0.6%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Eighteen patients (12%) sustained postoperative complications. Twelve (8%) patients required reoperations. One-year mortality rates were 10.1%.Conclusions:Long cephalomedullary nails remain the preferred treatment option for the treatment of 31-A3-type fractures, demonstrating acceptable complication rates, low reoperation rates, and high rates of healing.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.