Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition), cilt.92, sa.2, ss.189-193, 2024 (SCI-Expanded)
Objective: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. Materials and methods: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. Results: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. Conclusions: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.