Contemporary Central Asia - JNU, cilt.17, sa.1, ss.85-111, 2013 (Hakemli Dergi)
This preliminary comparison between Turkish and Georgian state-civil society
relations reveals that, although the events and themes adopted by civil society
organizations have diverged in both countries, the strategies these NGOs have used
are similar. The effects of influencing (foreign) policy have been more successful
in Turkey than in Georgia. In Georgia the effects of NGO work had more effect
in ensuing fair elections and freedom of speech. In Turkey, NGOs had a headstart (no Soviet rule to deal with) and the size, economy and demography of the
country permit NGOs to be much less dependent financially on foreign donors or
the state. However, in the past decade more and more individuals who do speak
out have been jailed. This article shows that the understanding of modernization as
individuals becoming decreasingly constrained by state structures needs revision.