Multicenter Real-World Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer


Ellez H. İ., ÇalişkanYildirim E., Majidova N., AĞYOL Y., SARI M., SEMİZ H. S., ...Daha Fazla

Cancer Medicine, cilt.15, sa.5, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 15 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/cam4.71951
  • Dergi Adı: Cancer Medicine
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: carboplatin, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival, pathological complete response, triple-negative breast cancer
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The role of carboplatin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial, particularly in settings where access to immunotherapy is limited. This study evaluated the real-world impact of adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes in patients with TNBC. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with nonmetastatic TNBC treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy between 2018 and 2023 at three oncology centers in Turkey. Patients were grouped according to receipt of platinum-containing therapy. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with survival. Propensity score matching was also performed as a supportive analysis. Results: A total of 142 patients were included, of whom 45 (32.2%) received platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 80 patients (56.3%) achieved pCR. The pCR rate was significantly higher in the platinum group than in the non-platinum group (68.9% vs. 50.5%, p = 0.031). After a median follow-up of 57 months, 24 deaths and 33 DFS events were observed. Median OS and DFS were not reached. The 60-month OS rate was 96.0% in the platinum group and 73.9% in the non-platinum group (log-rank p = 0.027), whereas the 60-month DFS rates were 86.1% and 67.6%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.139). Patients who achieved pCR had significantly better OS and DFS than those with residual disease. In the propensity score-matched cohort, non-platinum treatment remained associated with inferior OS and DFS. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world cohort, carboplatin was associated with a higher pCR rate and numerically favorable survival outcomes. These findings may be clinically relevant where immunotherapy is not readily accessible but should be considered hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation.