Comparison of Usability of Sagittal Plane Parameters with Baumann Angle in Radiological Imaging of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Porovnání použitelnosti parametrů sagitální roviny s Baumannovým úhlem při radiologickém zobrazení suprakondylické zlomeniny humeru


Ülgen N. K., GENCER B., Doğan Ö.

Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, vol.93, no.1, pp.47-52, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 93 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.55095/achot2025/030
  • Journal Name: Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE
  • Page Numbers: pp.47-52
  • Keywords: Baumann angle, humeral shaft condylar angle, lateral capitellohumeral angle, pediatric elbow, supracondylar humerus fractures, teardrop figure
  • Marmara University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Purpose of the study Radiological studies in supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) often focus on coronal plane imaging. In our study, we focused on the measurements used in elbow sagittal plane imaging. We investigated the role of humeral shaft condylar angle (SCA) and lateral capitellohumeral angle (LCHA) in determining the reduction quality by comparing them with Baumann angle (BA). İnvestigated its effectiveness in assessing the reduction of the teardrop figure and in the follow-up period. Material and methods Eighty-eight patients with SCHF were included in the study. BA, SCA and LCHA measurements were taken on the nonfractured contralateral elbow. The same measurements were made on the postreduction radiographs of the fractured side and the two groups were compared. Angular measurements were performed on 98 healthy children to determine the normal values of SCA and LCHA. Teardrop figure was evaluated and compared as present or absent in the pre-fracture, post-reduction and 3-month control radiographs of 88 surgically treated patients. Results SCA and LCHA were found to be statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). BA was statistically consistent in both groups (p = 0.160). The reformation of the teardrop figure compared to post-fracture; when compared in post-reduction and postoperative 3rd-month radiographs, was statistically significant (p = 0.027, p < 0.001). Conclusions BA is an important parameter for evaluating reduction. SCA and LCHA were found to be unsuccessful in evaluating reduction. Additionally, evaluating the teardrop figure after reduction and in follow-ups is important in terms of assessing reduction quality and monitoring healing.