An Excellence Model Case Study Assessing the Gap in Managers´ Views by Hierarchical Clustering


Střeleček J., Stieberová B., Kalender Z. T., Žilka M.

QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY, cilt.28, sa.1, ss.88-106, 2024 (ESCI)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 28 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.12776/qip.v28i1.1924
  • Dergi Adı: QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, ABI/INFORM, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.88-106
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose:This paper highlights the importance of business excellence models for SMEs and compares results from different model versions and managerial perspectives.Methodology/Approach:In an SME case study, three EFQM versions were applied(START, START PLUS (both based onEFQM 2013)and EFQM 2020) to make a comparative analysis of evaluation results. It utilises hierarchical clustering to gauge managerial agreement and examines the shift from EFQM 2013 to EFQM 2020.Findings:The paper presents comparative results, emphasising differences in evaluations. These results underscore the robustness of EFQM model versions and the significance of assessing managerial perspectives.Research Limitation/implication:Similar analysis can be conducted for a large number of companies in order to make a comprehensive statistical comparison. Also, it could be useful to ePurpose:This paper highlights the importance of business excellence models for SMEs and compares results from different model versions and managerial perspectives.Methodology/Approach:In an SME case study, three EFQM versions were applied(START, START PLUS (both based onEFQM 2013)and EFQM 2020) to make a comparative analysis of evaluation results. It utilises hierarchical clustering to gauge managerial agreement and examines the shift from EFQM 2013 to EFQM 2020.Findings:The paper presents comparative results, emphasising differences in evaluations. These results underscore the robustness of EFQM model versions and the significance of assessing managerial perspectives.Research Limitation/implication:Similar analysis can be conducted for a large number of companies in order to make a comprehensive statistical comparison. Also, it could be useful to examine the differences among different branches of industry if there are any.Originality/Value of paper:It is believed that this study will contribute to the existing literature by presenting the case study implementation of the excellence modelsin anSME. A conducted case study increases originality in a value-added way by using managerial views’ evaluations.xamine the differences among different branches of industry if there are any.Originality/Value of paper:It is believed that this study will contribute to the existing literature by presenting the case study implementation of the excellence modelsin anSME. A conducted case study increases originality in a value-added way by using managerial views’ evaluations.