The effects of low HER2 expression on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors: a multicenter retrospective study


Creative Commons License

Guliyev M., Şen G. A., Gültürk İ., Majidova N., Akdağ G., Ahadzade A., ...More

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol.205, no.3, pp.633-640, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 205 Issue: 3
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s10549-024-07291-0
  • Journal Name: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, Gender Studies Database, Veterinary Science Database
  • Page Numbers: pp.633-640
  • Keywords: Breast cancer, HER2-low, Palbociclib, Ribociclib
  • Open Archive Collection: AVESIS Open Access Collection
  • Marmara University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Purpose: Endocrine therapy (ET) in combination with CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) is the standard treatment modality for hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). There is uncertainty about the prognostic and predictive value of HER2-low status and whether HER2-low BC is an individual biologic subtype. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of HER2 expression status on survival in mBC patients treated with first-line ET plus CDK 4/6i. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with HR + /HER2-negative mBC cancer who were treated with first-line CDK 4/6i in combination with ET from January 2016 to March 2023. Patients were divided into two groups (HER2-low and zero), and survival and safety analyses were performed. Results: A total of 201 patients were included in this study; of these, 73 (36.3%) had HER2-low disease and 128 (63.7%) had HER2-zero. There were 135 patients (67.2%) treated with ribociclib and 66 (32.8%) with palbociclib. Most of the patients (75.1%) received aromatase inhibitors as combination-endocrine therapy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The median follow-up was 19.1 months (range: 2.5–78.4). The most common side effect was neutropenia (22.4%). The frequency of grade 3–4 toxicity was similar between the HER2-zero and low patients (32% vs 31.5%; p = 0.939). Visceral metastases were present in 44.8% of patients. Between the HER2-low and zero groups, median PFS (25.2 vs 22.6 months, p = 0.972) and OS (not reached vs 37.5 months, p = 0.707) showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The prognostic value of HER2-low status remains controversial. Our study showed no significant effect of HER2 low expression on survival in patients receiving CDK 4/6i plus ET.