Effect of Anaerobic Fatigue on Hand-Eye Coordination and Reaction Time


Creative Commons License

Göçmen R., Aktop A., Merdan Ö., Kaplan E.

IV. Uluslararası Egzersiz ve Spor Psikolojisi Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 13 - 15 Nisan 2018, ss.68

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.68
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of anaerobic fatigue on hand-eye

coordination and reaction time.

Method: This study was conducted with 29 male volunteer students studying at the School

Physical Education and Sport at Akdeniz University in 2014-2015 education year. In order to

determine effects of anaerobic fatique on hand-eye coordination and reaction time we used

Two Arm Coordination Test (Lafayette Instrument) and Reaction Time Test (ProComp

Infinity Device, Biograph Infinity Program, Reaction Time Suit Softwar). We applied all

tests to participants in rest and after Wingate Anaerobic Power Test (WAnT).

Findings: As a result of hand-eye coordination test it was determined that all the variables did

not show normal distribution as a result of statistical analysis of the values obtained.

According to Wilcoxon Sign Test results, rest and after WAnT clockwise time (Z = -4.35, p

<.01), anticlockwise time (Z = -4.05, p <.01) and anticlockwise error (Z = -2.18, p =.03)

statistically significant difference was found. There was no statistically significant difference

between clockwise errors, rest and after WAnT condition measurements (p >.05).The

clockwise time obtained after WAnT, the clockwise reversed time and the clockwise reversed

number of errors were observed to be lower than the resting measures. When the reaction time

values were examined, the values revealed from the dominant hand did not show normality

distribution. But the values revealed from the non-dominant hand showed a normality

distribution. According to Wilcoxon Sign Test results, there was no statistically significant

difference between rest and after WAnT dominant hand reaction time values (Z=.24, p=.81).

The paired t-test showed that the value of non-dominant hand reaction time was similar rest

and after WAnT condition measurements, but the difference was not statistically significant (t

= -1.52, p =.14). The value of non-dominant hand reaction after WAnT condition

measurements increased but there was no statisticaly significant differences.

Results: It is seen that fatigue does not affect the reaction time and hand-eye coordination

negatively according to the obtained results, but it is seen that even in the case of fatigue even

with the increase of the learning levels of the participants, the results are better than the first

cases. The reason for this is thought to be the learning effects of test protocol.