Medico-political metaphors of counter-terrorism: The case of Turkey


BEYRİBEY T.

CRITICAL STUDIES ON TERRORISM, cilt.13, sa.3, ss.418-440, 2020 (ESCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1080/17539153.2020.1791388
  • Dergi Adı: CRITICAL STUDIES ON TERRORISM
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Political Science Complete
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.418-440
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Counter-terrorism, Turkey, medico-political metaphors, Syrian Civil War, SECURITY, WAR, INTERVENTION, VIOLENCE
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Medico-political metaphors can be defined as the organic imagining of a society (re)creating a normative distinction between identity and difference and mobilising specific types of political answers in which threats are constructed through organic language. Accordingly, society is made to resemble a body, thus creating a sense of unity, integrity and finitude, while terrorism is made to resemble a "pathology" that "infects", weakens and ultimately destroys the healthy social body. In this narrative, "terrorists" are rendered as abnormal and external, and thus terrorism is depoliticised. It is fictionalised as a "technical" issue necessitating expert intervention, in a manner resembling the doctor-patient relationship. To date, there has been little research on the interaction between this organic understanding of society and the Turkish experience of counter-terrorism practices. Therefore, taking as its context the Syrian civil war, this article aims to analyse how medicopolitical metaphors in the counter-terrorism discourse of the Turkish government function as boundary-producing practices. The article critically assesses how medico-political metaphors in terrorism discourse (re)constitute a power relationship through abnormalisation, externalisation and depoliticisation, and thus contribute to Critical Terrorism Studies by highlighting how policy makers use medico-political metaphors to constitute a reality about terrorism in order to mobilise certain political responses.