A gender gap in the manuscript review time of Turkish national journals?

Tutuncu L., DAĞ R.

Scientometrics, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s11192-024-05177-y
  • Dergi Adı: Scientometrics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, FRANCIS, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Computer & Applied Sciences, Index Islamicus, Information Science and Technology Abstracts, INSPEC, Library and Information Science Abstracts, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA), PAIS International, RILM Abstracts of Music Literature, zbMATH
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: 91, 91, Academic journals, Collaboration, Female representation, G14, Gender bias, I23, I28, Publication bias, Review time
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study shows a review time gender gap. In a sample of 44,371 published articles in 255 Turkish national journals, we document that female authors experience significantly longer peer review. We argue and find that review time follows a pecking order of authorship based on the joint efficiency of female versus male authorship and solo work versus teamwork. As a result, solo males experience the fastest reviews and female teams the longest reviews. The time differential between female and male solo-authored papers (solo gender gap) is 11.1 days (9.7%) and rises to 24.1 days (17%) for papers authored through same sex collaborations (team gender gap). Controlling for other factors, female authors are penalised by up to 7.1% longer review time. Significant gender gaps exist in six of the eight fields studied, including major areas such as Education, Business & Economics, and the General Social Sciences. Results suggest that subtle gender gaps persist despite improvements in women’s academic representation.