Impact of a personalized antidepressant prescription using genetics, socio-demographic and clinical data in major depressive disorder patients: A clinical study


Saudreau B., Ilgın S. E., Maatoug R., Haddadi N., Lemoine A., Millet B.

Journal of Affective Disorders, vol.407, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 407
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121753
  • Journal Name: Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Psycinfo
  • Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry, Clinical decision support systems (CDSS), Major depressive disorder (MDD), Personalized antidepressant prescription, Pharmacogenomics
  • Marmara University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common and disabling, and antidepressant selection often follows a trial-and-error process. Predictix is an artificial intelligence–based clinical decision support tool integrating genetic, socio-demographic, and clinical data to assist personalized prescribing. Objective To evaluate feasibility, preliminary clinical outcomes, tolerability, and acceptability of Predictix-guided antidepressant selection. Methods This single-center, open-label pilot study was conducted at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris) between August 2020 and July 2021. Thirty adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD were enrolled. Treatment was initiated according to Predictix recommendations and assessed at weeks 4 and 8. The primary outcome was response (≥50% reduction in QIDS-SR-16). Secondary outcomes included PHQ-9 and CGI-I response, tolerability, and acceptability. Analyses were performed on study completers. Results Twenty patients completed the study and 18 were included in the primary analysis. The primary response rate was 55.6% (95% CI: 33.7–75.4%). Secondary response rates were 61.1% (PHQ-9) and 72.2% (CGI-I). Clinical improvement (CGI- I ≤ 3) occurred in 94.4%. Mean treatment duration was 9.4 ± 2.3 weeks. Tolerability was favorable, with 66.7% showing FIBSER burden ≤2. Acceptability was generally positive, although the two-week genetic analysis delay was noted as a practical limitation. Conclusions Predictix-guided prescribing was feasible and showed response rates within reported clinical ranges. Larger randomized controlled trials are required to determine clinical added value over standard prescribing.