The effectiveness of three different recovery methods on blood lactate, acute muscle performance, and delayed-onset muscle soreness: a randomized comparative study

Akinci B., ZENGİNLER YAZGAN Y., Altinoluk T.

JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, cilt.60, sa.3, ss.345-354, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 60 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.23736/s0022-4707.19.10142-9
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.345-354
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Recovery of function, Electrical stimulation, Myofascial pain syndromes, NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION, ACTIVE RECOVERY, CROSS-OVER, EXERCISE, MOTION, RANGE, RELIABILITY, STRATEGIES, VALIDITY, MASSAGE
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUND: Recovery from exercise is important in sports and rehabilitation for preventing exercise-induced injuries and recovery of performance. This study aimed to compare active recovery (AR), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and foam rolling (FR) in terms of blood lactate (Bla) removal, reduction in delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), and restoration of muscle strength, endurance, and flexibility in healthy young individuals.