Comparison of sulfidogenic up-flow and down-flow fluidized-bed reactors for the biotreatment of acidic metal-containing wastewater


Sahinkaya E., Gungor M.

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, vol.101, no.24, pp.9508-9514, 2010 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 101 Issue: 24
  • Publication Date: 2010
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.113
  • Journal Name: BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.9508-9514
  • Keywords: Sulfate reduction, Zinc removal, Copper removal, Fluidized-bed reactor, Acid mine drainage
  • Marmara University Affiliated: No

Abstract

Biotreatment of Cu- and Zn-containing synthetic wastewater was studied in sulfate-reducing up-flow (UFBR) and down-flow fluidized-bed reactors (DFBR) at 35 °C. The robustness of the systems was studied by stepwise increasing feed metal concentrations (total metal concentrations 25-300. mg/L) and decreasing feed pH (down to 2.0). Lactate was used as a carbon and energy source for sulfate reducing bacteria. After start-up, sulfate reduction and COD oxidation efficiencies were 60-86% and 87-95% in UFBR and, 40-88 and 55-95% in DFBR, respectively. Optimum COD/sulfate ratio for sulfate reduction was 0.85 and 1.25 for UFBR and DFBR, respectively. Approximately 70% and 55% of the electrons produced from lactate oxidation were used for sulfate reduction in UFBR and DFBR, respectively. Sulfide production and metal precipitation capacity of UFBR were higher than those of DFBR, although down-flow regime gave the possibility of metal recovery. Metals were precipitated more than 99% in both reactors. XRF analyses showed that metals were precipitated as metal-sulfides. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.