Initial inferior vena cava and aorta diameter parameters measured by ultrasonography or computed tomography does not correlate with vital signs, hemorrhage or shock markers in trauma patients

Celik O. F., AKOĞLU H., Celik A., Asadov R., ONUR Ö. E., DENİZBAŞI ALTINOK A.

ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, cilt.24, sa.4, ss.351-358, 2018 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.72365
  • Dergi Adı: ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.351-358
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Aorta, aortacaval index, caval index, collapsibility index, diameter, distensibility index, inferior vena cava, shock, trauma, CENTRAL VENOUS-PRESSURE, RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE, SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT, HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS, NONINVASIVE ESTIMATION, INTRAVASCULAR VOLUME, FLUID STATUS, BLOOD-LOSS, ULTRASOUND, INDEX
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive, readily available, and cheap. The diameter of inferior vena cava (dIVC) and its respiratory variation were proposed as a good surrogate of the hemodynamic state. However, recent studies have shown conflicting results, and the value of IVC-derived parameters in the estimation of fluid status and hemorrhage remains unclear.