Enhancing Pre-service Physics Teachers' Perceived Self-efficacy of Argumentation-based Pedagogy through Modelling and Mastery Experiences


Ogan-Bekiroglu F., Aydeniz M.

EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, cilt.9, sa.3, ss.233-245, 2013 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 9 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2013
  • Doi Numarası: 10.12973/eurasia.2013.932a
  • Dergi Adı: EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.233-245
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: science teachers' beliefs, student teachers' beliefs, science teacher education in Georgia, STUDENTS ARGUMENTATION, SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS, SCIENCE, INQUIRY, SENSE, SCAFFOLDS, EDUCATION, THINKING, SKILLS
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study explored the impact of explicit instruction on argumentation-based pedagogy, coupled with modelling and hands-on learning activities on pre-service physics teachers' perceived self-efficacy to teach science through argumentation. Participants consisted of 24 pre-service physics teachers attending an established teacher education program at a Turkish university. The results showed that the intervention had a positive impact on participants' self-efficacy to teach science through argumentation. More specifically, pre-service teachers who participated in this study: 1) viewed argumentation as a pedagogical tool that can help students to engage in meaningful learning, 2) reported high self-efficacy to teach science through argumentation and 3) indicated high motivation to teach science through argumentation in their future classrooms. In spite of these positive outcomes, participants shared their hesitations to teach science through argumentation as well. The implications of these findings for teacher education, teacher induction and future research are discussed.