Ozen, G. Et Al. 2016. The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?. RHEUMATOLOGY , vol.55, no.3 , 513-522.

Ozen, G., SÜNBÜL, M., Atagunduz, P., Direskeneli, H., Tigen, K., & Inanc, N., (2016). The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?. RHEUMATOLOGY , vol.55, no.3, 513-522.

Ozen, Gulsen Et Al. "The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?," RHEUMATOLOGY , vol.55, no.3, 513-522, 2016

Ozen, Gulsen Et Al. "The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?." RHEUMATOLOGY , vol.55, no.3, pp.513-522, 2016

Ozen, G. Et Al. (2016) . "The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?." RHEUMATOLOGY , vol.55, no.3, pp.513-522.

@article{article, author={Gulsen Ozen Et Al. }, title={The 2013 ACC/AHA 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk index is better than SCORE and QRisk II in rheumatoid arthritis: is it enough?}, journal={RHEUMATOLOGY}, year=2016, pages={513-522} }