O. Yesiloglu Et Al. , "Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask," CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8, pp.769, 2021
Yesiloglu, O. Et Al. 2021. Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask. CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8 , 769.
Yesiloglu, O., Gulen, M., Satar, S., Acehan, S., & AKOĞLU, H., (2021). Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask. CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8, 769.
Yesiloglu, Onder Et Al. "Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask," CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8, 769, 2021
Yesiloglu, Onder Et Al. "Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask." CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8, pp.769, 2021
Yesiloglu, O. Et Al. (2021) . "Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask." CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY , vol.59, no.8, p.769.
@article{article, author={Onder Yesiloglu Et Al. }, title={Response to Comment on Treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning: high-flow nasal cannula versus non-rebreather face mask}, journal={CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY}, year=2021, pages={769} }