Peker, S. Et Al. 2017. Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite. JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , vol.31, no.5 , 509-519.

Peker, S., EREN GİRAY, F., DURMUŞ, B., Bekiroglu, N., KARGÜL, B., & Ozcan, M., (2017). Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite. JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , vol.31, no.5, 509-519.

Peker, MEHMET Et Al. "Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite," JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , vol.31, no.5, 509-519, 2017

Peker, MEHMET S. Et Al. "Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite." JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , vol.31, no.5, pp.509-519, 2017

Peker, S. Et Al. (2017) . "Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite." JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , vol.31, no.5, pp.509-519.

@article{article, author={MEHMET SERTAÇ PEKER Et Al. }, title={Microleakage in class V cavities prepared using conventional method versus Er:YAG laser restored with glass ionomer cement or resin composite}, journal={JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY}, year=2017, pages={509-519} }