L. DRAGOS Et Al. , "219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?," 32nd Annual EAU Congress , Londrina, Brazil, 2017
DRAGOS, L. Et Al. 2017. 219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?. 32nd Annual EAU Congress , (Londrina, Brazil).
DRAGOS, L., BUTTICE, S., ŞENER, T. E., PROIETTI, S., PLOUMIDIS, A., IACOBOAIE, C., ... DOIZI, S.(2017). 219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection? . 32nd Annual EAU Congress, Londrina, Brazil
DRAGOS, LAURIAN Et Al. "219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?," 32nd Annual EAU Congress, Londrina, Brazil, 2017
DRAGOS, LAURIAN Et Al. "219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?." 32nd Annual EAU Congress , Londrina, Brazil, 2017
DRAGOS, L. Et Al. (2017) . "219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?." 32nd Annual EAU Congress , Londrina, Brazil.
@conferencepaper{conferencepaper, author={LAURIAN DRAGOS Et Al. }, title={219 - Which flexible ureteroscopes (digital vs optical) can easily reach the difficult lower pole calyces and have better end-tip deflection?}, congress name={32nd Annual EAU Congress}, city={Londrina}, country={Brazil}, year={2017}}